David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 15:45 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
That would break iptables compilation, which already includes
linux/in.h in some files. I guess the best fix for now is to
include netinet/in.h in busybox and long-term clean this up
properly.
Yeah, that makes sense.
Can we push the change to __u32 (or uint32_t) for 2.6.24? Or is there
something obvious we should be doing in busybox which we aren't? I don't
quite understand why this u_int32_t crap doesn't work at _all_ when it
evidently used to at least in some environments.
I already sent it to Dave for 2.6.25 (I assume that what you meant,
it was introduced after 2.6.24), its currently sitting in net-2.6
and should hit Linus' tree next time he pulls from Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
