On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:53:36PM +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote:
>
> The PCI_DEVICE_TABLE patch I sent earlier doesn't necessarily make
> much sense by itself... here is a set of patches that apply
> this macro, in turn moving a lot of this data into __devinitconst
> which is discardable in certain situations.
> Hopefully the benefit of this approach is a bit clearer now.
[shorter lines please..]
Can you please confirm that this does not break powerpc (64 bit)
as they have troubles with the constification..
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
