On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 04:59:54PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Eliminate warnings when rcu_assign_pointer is used with unsigned long. > It is reasonable to use RCU with non-pointer values so allow it for general > use. Add a comment to explain the if test.
Good catch!!! (An apologies for the hassle!!!) Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 13 +++++++------ > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > index 37a642c..c44ac87 100644 > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h > @@ -172,14 +172,15 @@ struct rcu_head { > * structure after the pointer assignment. More importantly, this > * call documents which pointers will be dereferenced by RCU read-side > * code. > + * > + * If value is the NULL (constant 0), then no barrier is needed. > */ > > -#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) \ > - ({ \ > - if (!__builtin_constant_p(v) || \ > - ((v) != NULL)) \ > - smp_wmb(); \ > - (p) = (v); \ > +#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) \ > + ({ \ > + if (!(__builtin_constant_p(v) && v)) \ > + smp_wmb(); \ > + (p) = (v); \ > }) > > /** > -- > 1.5.3.8 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html