> Or maybe use percpu storage for that... That seems like a good approach. I'll incorporate it into my v6 patch, and send out an update. Thanks.
> I am not sure if cookie_hash() is always called with preemption disabled. > (If not, we have to use get_cpu_var()/put_cpu_var()) cookie_hash is always called within NET_RX_SOFTIRQ context so I believe preemption will always be disabled by __do_softirq(). So there shouldn't be a need to use get_cpu_var/put_cpu_var, somebody correct me if I'm wrong. --Glenn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
