Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: > Hi > > Probably bug related to ESFQ, now i will unload module and will test more. > But probably not related, so if not difficult, please take a look. > > Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER [12380.067104] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL > pointer dereference > Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER at virtual address 00000008 > Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER [12380.067140] printing eip: c01f10ed > Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER *pde = 00000000 > Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER > Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER [12380.067162] Oops: 0000 [#1] > Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER SMP > Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER > Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER [12380.067181] Modules linked in: > Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER netconsole > Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER configfs > Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER iTCO_wdt > Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER nf_nat_pptp > Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER nf_conntrack_pptp > Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER nf_conntrack_proto_gre > Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER nf_nat_proto_gre > Feb 1 09:08:50 SERVER sch_esfq
I'd rather you were using my recent patches to SFQ instead of ESFQ. I was able to crash a 2.6.24 user-mode Linux with ESFQ as well; I don't know if that's what you encountered, but the SFQ patches should be better anyway. http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/sfq-2.6.24.tar.bz2 http://fatooh.org/esfq-2.6/ -Corey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
