> On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:11:57 +0100 Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote, On 01/25/2008 11:26 PM: > > >> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:23:49 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9816 > > ... > > > I'd agree with Andrea: replacing a route with itself a) used to work and b) > > should still work (surely)? > > ...on the other hand: > > $ touch file1 > $ cp file1 file1 > cp: `file1' and `file1' are the same file > $ mv file1 file1 > mv: `file1' and `file1' are the same file > > and: 'everything' in 'linux' is file... > > ergo: route cannot replace with itself! >
That's not a very good analogy - the source is a kernel object. A better example would be: linux-2.6.24-rc8: echo foo > /tmp/1 echo bar > /tmp/2 echo foo > /tmp/1 linux-2.6.24: echo foo > /tmp/1 echo bar > /tmp/2 echo foo > /tmp/1 sh: cannot write /tmp/1: Inalid argument But whatever. It used to work. People's scripts will break. Regression. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
