On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, David Miller wrote: > From: "Dave Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:44:30 +0800 > > > On Jan 22, 2008 6:47 PM, Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [PATCH] [TCP]: debug S+L > > > > Thanks, If there's new findings I will let you know. > > Thanks for helping with this bug Dave.
I noticed btw that there thing might (is likely to) spuriously trigger at WARN_ON(sacked != tp->sacked_out); because those won't be equal when SACK is not enabled. If that does happen too often, I send a fixed patch for it, yet, the fact that I print print tp->rx_opt.sack_ok allows identification of those cases already as it's zero when SACK is not enabled. Just ask if you need the updated debug patch. -- i.
