We omit (or delay) sending NSes for known-to-unreachable routers
(in NUD_FAILED state) according to RFC 4191 (Default Router Preferences
and More-Specific Routes).
But this is not fully compatible with RFC 4861 (Neighbor Discovery Protocol
for IPv6), which does not remember unreachability of neighbors.
So, let's avoid mixing sending algorithm of RFC 4191 and that of RFC 4861,
and make the algorithm more friendly with RFC 4861 if RFC 4191 is disabled.
Issue was found by IPv6 Ready Logo Core Self_Test 1.5.0b2 (by TAHI Project),
and has been tracked down by Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index 6ecb5e6..20083e0 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ static inline int rt6_check_dev(struct rt6_info *rt, int
oif)
static inline int rt6_check_neigh(struct rt6_info *rt)
{
struct neighbour *neigh = rt->rt6i_nexthop;
- int m = 0;
+ int m;
if (rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_NONEXTHOP ||
!(rt->rt6i_flags & RTF_GATEWAY))
m = 1;
@@ -337,10 +337,15 @@ static inline int rt6_check_neigh(struct rt6_info *rt)
read_lock_bh(&neigh->lock);
if (neigh->nud_state & NUD_VALID)
m = 2;
- else if (!(neigh->nud_state & NUD_FAILED))
+#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF
+ else if (neigh->nud_state & NUD_FAILED)
+ m = 0;
+#endif
+ else
m = 1;
read_unlock_bh(&neigh->lock);
- }
+ } else
+ m = 0;
return m;
}
--
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki @ USAGI Project <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG-FP : 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF 80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
