Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, it was more a rhetorical trick (sorry!) to suggest, that such a > business model of being always late with kernels might be quite > practical and reasonable for many companies, but looks like the > worst possible development model for Linux.
Well people are always going to operate on this model for commercial reasons. FWIW I used to work for a company that stuck to a specific version of the Linux kernel, and I suppose I still do even now :) But the important thing is that if you're going to do that, then the cost that comes with it should be borne by the company and not the community. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
