On 15-01-2008 07:36, Makito SHIOKAWA wrote: > Change code not to rearm bond_mii_monitor() when value 0 is set for miimon. > > Signed-off-by: Makito SHIOKAWA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c > @@ -2388,7 +2388,8 @@ void bond_mii_monitor(struct work_struct > > delay = ((bond->params.miimon * HZ) / 1000) ? : 1; > read_unlock(&bond->lock); > - queue_delayed_work(bond->wq, &bond->mii_work, delay); > + if (bond->params.miimon) > + queue_delayed_work(bond->wq, &bond->mii_work, delay); > }
Maybe I miss something, but is this bond_mii_monitor() function supposed to be ever started if (!bond->params.miimon)? (IOW: isn't it enough to control this where the parameter is changed only?) Regards, Jarek P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
