On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 10:11:40AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > So, IOW: strictly speaking you are right, r can't change here, but I > meant r vs. the returned value! Before the patch the returned value > couldn't be NULL unless all elements of the list were looped. After > this patch it seems possible...
Since rcu_derference(r) is always the same as r this patch cannot change the value returned. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
