David Miller a écrit :
From: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:24:20 +0100

   CHECK   net/ipv4/icmp.c
net/ipv4/icmp.c:249:13: warning: context imbalance in 'icmp_xmit_unlock' - unexpected unlock net/ipv4/icmp.c:376:13: warning: context imbalance in 'icmp_reply' - different lock contexts for basic block net/ipv4/icmp.c:430:6: warning: context imbalance in 'icmp_send' - different lock contexts for basic block

Solution is to declare icmp_xmit_unlock() as __inline__ (similar with icmp_xmit_lock())

Please use "inline" instead of "__inline__".  If other stuff
uses __inline__ in that file, feel free to fix it up too.


You are right, here is the updated version

Thank you

[ICMP]: Avoid sparse warnings in net/ipv4/icmp.c

  CHECK   net/ipv4/icmp.c
net/ipv4/icmp.c:249:13: warning: context imbalance in 'icmp_xmit_unlock' - unexpected unlock net/ipv4/icmp.c:376:13: warning: context imbalance in 'icmp_reply' - different lock contexts for basic block net/ipv4/icmp.c:430:6: warning: context imbalance in 'icmp_send' - different lock contexts for basic block

Solution is to declare both icmp_xmit_lock() and icmp_xmit_unlock() as inline

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

 net/ipv4/icmp.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/icmp.c b/net/ipv4/icmp.c
index fc66c8a..1c256ff 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/icmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/icmp.c
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static const struct icmp_control 
icmp_pointers[NR_ICMP_TYPES+1];
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sock *, __icmp_sock) = NULL;
 #define icmp_sock      __get_cpu_var(__icmp_sock)
 
-static __inline__ int icmp_xmit_lock(void)
+static inline int icmp_xmit_lock(void)
 {
        local_bh_disable();
 
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ static __inline__ int icmp_xmit_lock(void)
        return 0;
 }
 
-static void icmp_xmit_unlock(void)
+static inline void icmp_xmit_unlock(void)
 {
        spin_unlock_bh(&icmp_sock->sk_lock.slock);
 }

Reply via email to