From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 11:12:32 +1100
> [INET]: Export non-blocking flags to proto connect call > > Previously we made connect(2) block on IPsec SA resolution. This is > good in general but not desirable for non-blocking sockets. > > To fix this properly we'd need to implement the larval IPsec dst stuff > that we talked about. For now let's just revert to the old behaviour > on non-blocking sockets. > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We made an explicit decision not to do things this way. Non-blocking has a meaning dependant upon the xfrm_larval_drop sysctl setting, and this is across the board. If xfrm_larval_drop is zero, non-blocking semantics do not extend to IPSEC route resolution, otherwise it does. If he sets this sysctl to "1" as I detailed in my reply, he'll get the behavior he wants. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
