On 04-12-2007 23:26, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > But, IMHO, blowing ASSERT_RTNL up in a few places shouldn't be much > worse. After all, how long such a debugging code should be kept. It > seems, at least sometimes we should be a bit more confident of how > it's called.
I see this won't be done this way, but, if it were, then there is no reason to remove the second: documenting feature of ASSERT_RTNL, so some comment about locking should be added. Jarek P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
