Previously one of the in-block skip branches was missing it.
Also, drop it from tail-fully-processed case because the next
iteration will do exactly the same thing, i.e., process the
SACK block that contains the DSACK information.
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 15 +++++----------
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index cd6924e..dae000b 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -1554,20 +1554,15 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff
*ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
}
/* Rest of the block already fully processed? */
- if (!after(end_seq, cache->end_seq)) {
- skb = tcp_maybe_skipping_dsack(skb, sk,
next_dup, cache->end_seq,
- &fack_count,
&reord, &flag);
+ if (!after(end_seq, cache->end_seq))
goto advance_sp;
- }
+
+ skb = tcp_maybe_skipping_dsack(skb, sk, next_dup,
cache->end_seq,
+ &fack_count, &reord,
&flag);
/* ...tail remains todo... */
if (TCP_SKB_CB(tp->highest_sack)->end_seq ==
cache->end_seq) {
- /* ...but better entrypoint exists! Check that
DSACKs are
- * properly accounted while skipping here
- */
- tcp_maybe_skipping_dsack(skb, sk, next_dup,
cache->end_seq,
- &fack_count, &reord,
&flag);
-
+ /* ...but better entrypoint exists! */
skb = tcp_write_queue_next(sk,
tp->highest_sack);
fack_count = tp->fackets_out;
cache++;
--
1.5.0.6
