From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:37:26 +0200
> This implements more accurately what is stated in sacktag's > overall comment: > > "Both of these heuristics are not used in Loss state, when > we cannot account for retransmits accurately." > > When CA_Loss state is entered, the state changer ensures that > undo_marker is only set if no TCPCB_RETRANS skbs were found, > thus having non-zero undo_marker in CA_Loss basically tells > that the R-bits still accurately reflect the current state > of TCP. > > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied to net-2.6.25, thanks! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
