This implements more accurately what is stated in sacktag's
overall comment:

  "Both of these heuristics are not used in Loss state, when
   we cannot account for retransmits accurately."

When CA_Loss state is entered, the state changer ensures that
undo_marker is only set if no TCPCB_RETRANS skbs were found,
thus having non-zero undo_marker in CA_Loss basically tells
that the R-bits still accurately reflect the current state
of TCP.

Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c |    3 ++-
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index c470b5a..48c059d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -1511,7 +1511,8 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff 
*ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_
 
        tcp_verify_left_out(tp);
 
-       if ((reord < tp->fackets_out) && icsk->icsk_ca_state != TCP_CA_Loss &&
+       if ((reord < tp->fackets_out) &&
+           ((icsk->icsk_ca_state != TCP_CA_Loss) || tp->undo_marker) &&
            (!tp->frto_highmark || after(tp->snd_una, tp->frto_highmark)))
                tcp_update_reordering(sk, tp->fackets_out - reord, 0);
 
-- 
1.5.0.6

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to