This implements more accurately what is stated in sacktag's overall comment:
"Both of these heuristics are not used in Loss state, when we cannot account for retransmits accurately." When CA_Loss state is entered, the state changer ensures that undo_marker is only set if no TCPCB_RETRANS skbs were found, thus having non-zero undo_marker in CA_Loss basically tells that the R-bits still accurately reflect the current state of TCP. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index c470b5a..48c059d 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -1511,7 +1511,8 @@ tcp_sacktag_write_queue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *ack_skb, u32 prior_snd_ tcp_verify_left_out(tp); - if ((reord < tp->fackets_out) && icsk->icsk_ca_state != TCP_CA_Loss && + if ((reord < tp->fackets_out) && + ((icsk->icsk_ca_state != TCP_CA_Loss) || tp->undo_marker) && (!tp->frto_highmark || after(tp->snd_una, tp->frto_highmark))) tcp_update_reordering(sk, tp->fackets_out - reord, 0); -- 1.5.0.6 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html