Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A cheaper change might have been to just limit the number of buckets
> scanned.

Actually the whole point of moving it out to process context
is so that we don't have to worry about keeping track of the number
of buckets since deciding on how many buckets to process is black
magic.

IMHO preemption is the answer :) But failing that, a resched
is the next best thing.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to