Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 01:50:04PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: >> Em Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 06:32:51PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu: >>> This one is used only under ifdef PACKET_REFCNT_DEBUG in >>> printk and is not needed otherwise. So hide all this stuff >>> under the PACKET_REFCNT_DEBUG. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Look at sk_refcnt_debug_inc, etc and you'll se a more standard way. I >> forgot to make this when making all protocol families use sk_prot, even >> if just partially :-) > > As a bonus you'll get this information on /proc/net/protocols, removing > '-1' from PACKET column for "sockets".
Hm... I actually thought about this, but I decided that packet sockets were not accounted in this way deliberately. So, shall I break this "compatibility" (-1 in proc) and provide a packet socket number in this file? > - Arnaldo Thanks, Pavel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
