In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Tue, 06 Nov 2007 21:37:50 -0800 (PST)), David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> From: David Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 21:26:15 -0800 > > > Last I heard, there are Intellectual Property claims with ISATAP, > > which is why the RFC is not standards track and which makes it > > effectively a proprietary protocol. > > > > Unless that's been resolved, I think the claim by the IP owner is > > that it can't be distributed without a license from them. So, maybe > > not worth the effort for an experimental RFC. > > If this is the case, I agree, we cannot include ISATAP > support in the kernel. I guess license is no longer required for implementers of ISATAP. Is it right, Fred? https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/550/ --yoshfuji - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
