Joe Perches wrote:
> Add functions for reg_pattern_test and reg_set_and check
> Changed macros to use these functions
> 
> Compiled x86, untested
> 
> Size decreased ~2K
> 
> old:
> 
> $ size drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.o
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>   14461       0       0   14461    387d drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.o
> 
> new:
> 
> $ size drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.o
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
>   12498       0       0   12498    30d2 drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.o
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

ok, this looks great.

I'm going to have this tested a bit before I pass it on to Jeff Garzik.

Thanks!

Auke


> 
> ---
> 
>  drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.c |   78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.c b/drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.c
> index 6a39784..225db17 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.c
> @@ -691,41 +691,57 @@ err_setup:
>       return err;
>  }
>  
> -#define REG_PATTERN_TEST(R, M, W) REG_PATTERN_TEST_ARRAY(R, 0, M, W)
> -#define REG_PATTERN_TEST_ARRAY(reg, offset, mask, writeable)               \
> -{                                                                          \
> -     u32 _pat;                                                             \
> -     u32 _value;                                                           \
> -     u32 _test[] = {0x5A5A5A5A, 0xA5A5A5A5, 0x00000000, 0xFFFFFFFF};       \
> -     for (_pat = 0; _pat < ARRAY_SIZE(_test); _pat++) {                    \
> -             E1000_WRITE_REG_ARRAY(hw, reg, offset,        \
> -                                   (_test[_pat] & writeable));             \
> -             _value = E1000_READ_REG_ARRAY(hw, reg, offset);     \
> -             if (_value != (_test[_pat] & writeable & mask)) {             \
> -                     ndev_err(netdev, "pattern test reg %04X "             \
> -                              "failed: got 0x%08X expected 0x%08X\n",      \
> -                              reg + offset,  \
> -                              value, (_test[_pat] & writeable & mask));    \
> -                     *data = reg;                                          \
> -                     return 1;                                             \
> -             }                                                             \
> -     }                                                                     \
> +bool reg_pattern_test_array(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u64 *data, 
> +                         int reg, int offset, u32 mask, u32 write)
> +{
> +     int i;
> +     u32 read;
> +     static const u32 test[] = 
> +             {0x5A5A5A5A, 0xA5A5A5A5, 0x00000000, 0xFFFFFFFF};
> +     for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test); i++) {
> +             E1000_WRITE_REG_ARRAY(&adapter->hw, reg, offset,
> +                                   (test[i] & write));
> +             read = E1000_READ_REG_ARRAY(&adapter->hw, reg, offset);
> +             if (read != (test[i] & write & mask)) {
> +                     ndev_err(adapter->netdev, "pattern test reg %04X "
> +                              "failed: got 0x%08X expected 0x%08X\n",
> +                              reg + offset,
> +                              read, (test[i] & write & mask));
> +                     *data = reg;
> +                     return true;
> +             }
> +     }
> +     return false;
>  }
>  
> -#define REG_SET_AND_CHECK(R, M, W)                                         \
> -{                                                                          \
> -     u32 _value;                                                           \
> -     __ew32(hw, R, W & M);                                           \
> -     _value = __er32(hw, R);                                         \
> -     if ((W & M) != (_value & M)) {                                        \
> -             ndev_err(netdev, "set/check reg %04X test failed: "           \
> -                      "got 0x%08X expected 0x%08X\n", R, (_value & M),     \
> -                      (W & M));                                            \
> -             *data = R;                                                    \
> -             return 1;                                                     \
> -     }                                                                     \
> +#define REG_PATTERN_TEST(R, M, W) \
> +     if (reg_pattern_test_array(adapter, data, R, 0, M, W)) \
> +             return 1;
> +
> +#define REG_PATTERN_TEST_ARRAY(R, offset, M, W) \
> +     if (reg_pattern_test_array(adapter, data, R, offset, M, W)) \
> +             return 1;
> +
> +static bool reg_set_and_check(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u64 *data,
> +                           int reg, u32 mask, u32 write)
> +{
> +     u32 read;
> +     __ew32(&adapter->hw, reg, write & mask);
> +     read = __er32(&adapter->hw, reg);
> +     if ((write & mask) != (read & mask)) {
> +             ndev_err(adapter->netdev, "set/check reg %04X test failed: "
> +                      "got 0x%08X expected 0x%08X\n", reg, (read & mask),
> +                      (write & mask));
> +             *data = reg;
> +             return true;
> +     }
> +     return false;
>  }
>  
> +#define REG_SET_AND_CHECK(R, M, W) \
> +     if (reg_set_and_check(adapter, data, R, M, W)) \
> +             return 1;
> +
>  static int e1000_reg_test(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u64 *data)
>  {
>       struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to