Wednesday 24 October 2007 21:18, jamal wrote: > On Wed, 2007-24-10 at 12:30 +0900, Masahide NAKAMURA wrote: > > > At IPsec point of view, actually "SPI mismatch" caused by user configuration > > cannot be identified easily since identify of SAD is consist of SPI, > > address and > > protocol(ESP/AH...) and linux SAD uses hash database. It is database > > identify > > mismatch. Then, SPI mismatch goes "NoStates" at my patch. > > OTOH Key mismatch goes "ProtoError" since esp[46]_input returns error. > > Would be useful to just document what you said above so that user doesnt > have to intepret it.
OK, I write it to commit-log then. If anybody have another place where such information should be written, tell me. [snip] > > > In any case, it seems to me to be more accurate to not call them MIB > > > stats if they are not. This doesnt qualify using the macros, utilities > > > etc used for MIBs. > > > > BTW, I meant "doesnt disqualify them" above;-> OK ;-) Jamal, thanks for many comments. -- Masahide NAKAMURA - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
