On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 23:15:48 +0200 (CEST)
Krzysztof Oledzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> Is it normal that TCP port randomization (tested with 2.6.22) works only 
> when explicitly binding to a IP address:
> 
> 
> --- cut here ---
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# nc 192.168.129.28 11
> (UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# nc 192.168.129.28 11
> (UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# nc 192.168.129.28 11
> (UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
> 
> 23:11:11.896126 IP 192.168.129.2.37839 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
> 23:11:12.146573 IP 192.168.129.2.37840 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
> 23:11:12.396488 IP 192.168.129.2.37841 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
> --- cut here ---
> 
> 
> --- cut here ---
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# nc -s 192.168.129.2 192.168.129.28 11
> (UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# nc -s 192.168.129.2 192.168.129.28 11
> (UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# nc -s 192.168.129.2 192.168.129.28 11
> (UNKNOWN) [192.168.129.28] 11 (systat) : Connection refused
> 
> 23:11:31.704391 IP 192.168.129.2.57204 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
> 23:11:34.400048 IP 192.168.129.2.14512 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
> 23:11:34.606707 IP 192.168.129.2.20117 > 192.168.129.28.11: S
> --- cut here ---
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>                               Krzysztof Olędzki

It is a expected side effect. The starting point for the search
is based on hash(srcaddr, dstaddr, dstport, secret).
You are using same source, dest and port so yes it will stay
the same until rekeying occurs.
The secret only changes every 5min same as TCP initial sequence number.



-- 
Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to