On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 02:31:26PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: > > Programming with assertions (and BUG_ON is a form of that) is > > generally a good practice. Almost any book or other source on
> The problem with BUG_ON is that it kills the whole system. So every > time you add a BUG_ON into code, you have to weigh whether the problem > you detected is so severe that the right response is to panic. For > example, I can see panicking on something fundamental like corrupted > page tables. However I would submit that the wireless stack should > *never* use BUG_ON -- printing a warning and trying to limp on seems > preferable to me. OK, I'll buy that as an argument to use WARN_ON instead of BUG_ON. But it doesn't invalidate the desire to have some sort of assertion. John -- John W. Linville [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
