Peter Korsgaard wrote:
Please apply to 2.6.23. --- dm9601 didn't take the ethernet header into account when calculating RX MTU, causing packets bigger than 1486 to fail.Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/net/usb/dm9601.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Index: linux-2.6.23-rc8/drivers/net/usb/dm9601.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.23-rc8.orig/drivers/net/usb/dm9601.c +++ linux-2.6.23-rc8/drivers/net/usb/dm9601.c @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ dev->net->ethtool_ops = &dm9601_ethtool_ops; dev->net->hard_header_len += DM_TX_OVERHEAD; dev->hard_mtu = dev->net->mtu + dev->net->hard_header_len; - dev->rx_urb_size = dev->net->mtu + DM_RX_OVERHEAD; + dev->rx_urb_size = dev->net->mtu + ETH_HLEN + DM_RX_OVERHEAD;
applied. in the future, please note (and avoid) a patch formatting error. As noted in #14 of Documentation/SubmittingPatches, any comments on the patch like "Please apply to 2.6.23" should go AFTER the patch description and "---" separator.
Without hand editing, the normal tools everybody uses for importing patches would delete your "dm9601 didn't take the ethernet header..." description, leaving only the "Please apply to 2.6.23." part and nothing else.
I did the hand-editing, but please try to follow the standard patch format in the future.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
