On Wed, 2007-22-08 at 13:21 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:09:37 -0700
>
> > Should it be any more or less worrysome than small packet
> > performance (eg the TCP_RR stuff I posted recently) being rather
> > worse with TSO enabled than with it disabled?
>
> That, like any such thing shown by the batching changes, is a bug
> to fix.
Possibly a bug - but you really should turn off TSO if you are doing
huge interactive transactions (which is fair because there is a clear
demarcation).
The litmus test is the same as any change that is supposed to improve
net performance - it has to demonstrate it is not intrusive and that it
improves (consistently) performance. The standard metrics are
{throughput, cpu-utilization, latency} i.e as long as one improves and
others remain zero, it would make sense. Yes, i am religious for
batching after all the invested sweat (and i continue to work on it
hoping to demystify) - the theory makes a lot of sense.
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
