On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 03:48:54PM -0400, Chris Snook wrote: > > >Can you find an actual atomic_read code snippet there that is > >broken without the volatile modifier? > > A whole bunch of atomic_read uses will be broken without the volatile > modifier once we start removing barriers that aren't needed if volatile > behavior is guaranteed.
Could you please cite the file/function names so we can see whether removing the barrier makes sense? Thanks, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
