Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 07:34:03PM +0200, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
>
>> Checking some other source with the current net-2.6.24 GIT, i just
>> discovered this:
>>
>> CC drivers/net/mii.o
>> CC drivers/net/Space.o
>> CC drivers/net/loopback.o
>> CC drivers/net/b44.o
>> CC drivers/net/forcedeth.o
>> drivers/net/forcedeth.c: In function nv_nic_irq:
>> drivers/net/forcedeth.c:3017: error: RX_WORK_PER_LOOP undeclared (first
>> use in this function)
>> drivers/net/forcedeth.c:3017: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
>> reported only once
>> drivers/net/forcedeth.c:3017: error: for each function it appears in.)
>> make[2]: *** [drivers/net/forcedeth.o] Error 1
>> make[1]: *** [drivers/net] Error 2
>> make: *** [drivers] Error 2
>>
>> This only occurs the CONFIG_FORCEDETH_NAPI is _disabled_.
>>
> This fixes the build:
>
> --
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> drivers/net/forcedeth.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/forcedeth.c b/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
> index 37732f9..90eef4a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/forcedeth.c
> @@ -2973,6 +2973,8 @@ static void nv_link_irq(struct net_device *dev)
> dprintk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: link change notification done.\n", dev->name);
> }
>
> +#define TX_WORK_PER_LOOP 64
> +#define RX_WORK_PER_LOOP 64
> static irqreturn_t nv_nic_irq(int foo, void *data)
> {
> struct net_device *dev = (struct net_device *) data;
> @@ -3083,8 +3085,6 @@ static irqreturn_t nv_nic_irq(int foo, void *data)
> return IRQ_RETVAL(i);
> }
>
> -#define TX_WORK_PER_LOOP 64
> -#define RX_WORK_PER_LOOP 64
> /**
> * All _optimized functions are used to help increase performance
> * (reduce CPU and increase throughput). They use descripter version 3,
>
>
>
>
Hi Samuel,
indeed a small thing that fixed the build problem :-)
Thanks for your patch & best regards,
Oliver
Acked-by: Oliver Hartkopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
