Chris Snook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > cpu_relax() contains a barrier, so it should do the right thing. For non-smp > architectures, I'm concerned about interacting with interrupt handlers. Some > drivers do use atomic_* operations.
I'm not sure that actually answers my question. Why not smp_rmb()? David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
