From: Florian Zumbiehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:05:47 +0200
> A few variations I tried back when I created the patch, using larger > things than a char for accumulating the pieces and then folding down > from that, turned out to be slower than what I finally submitted, at > least on the machines I tested it on. I didn't do comprehensive testing, > as it really doesn't matter, after all, but I think the version I > submitted is pretty fast, plus it's quite readable, and it keeps the > flexibility of different hash sizes, but still should allow the > compiler to optimize away the loops that allow for this flexibility. Therefore, I've put your original patch into the tree :-) Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
