Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Le mercredi 11 juillet 2007, David Stevens a écrit : >> That sounds like a good idea to me (FWIW), >> though I also still think a simple raw-socket >> application would do it just fine, possibly with >> no kernel modification at all. >> But since the kernel wouldn't be maintaining >> the DNS info, which was my real objection to the >> original version, netlink would work well too. > > One remaining corner case is NFS/IPv6 root, whereby userland won't have > a chance to start before the network, and hence may miss the solicited > RA. Or would it? By default, the next unsolicited RA can be anytime > from now to after 10 minutes, so that's not sufficient. I wouldn't > personnaly care, but... >
You've got the same issue with the socket option approach. -vlad - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
