From: Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 08:41:59 +0200
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 09:52:26AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > > > From my recent patch: > > > > > > #1 > > > > Until kernel ver. 2.6.21 (including) cancel_rearming_delayed_work() > > > > required a work function should always (unconditionally) rearm with > > > > delay > 0 - otherwise it would endlessly loop. This patch replaces > > > > this function with cancel_delayed_work(). Later kernel versions don't > > > > require this, so here it's only for uniformity. > > > > But Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> found: > > > > > But 2.6.22 doesn't need this change, why it was merged? > > > > > > In fact, I suspect this change adds a race, > > ... > > > > His description was right (thanks), so this patch reverts #1. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Oleg, > > I think maybe you could ack these 2 netconsole patches... > They were done on your request but it looks like Andrew > is waiting on something... I plan to apply this patch, don't worry about it :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html