On Tuesday 03 July 2007 00:02:57 Kok, Auke wrote: > well, FWIW when I started looking at adding these flags I looked in various > subsystems in the kernel and picked an implementation that suited. Guess what > pci.h has? ...: > > unsigned int msi_enabled:1; > unsigned int msix_enabled:1; > > this is literally where I copied the example from > > I suppose I can fix those, but I really don't understand what all the fuzz is > about here. We're only conserving memory and staying far away from the real
I'm not sure if these bitfields actually _do_ conserve memory. Generated code gets bigger (need bitwise masks and stuff). Code also needs memory. It probably only conserves memory, if the structure is instanciated a lot. -- Greetings Michael. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
