On Fri, 2007-29-06 at 14:31 -0700, David Miller wrote: > This conversation begins to go into a pointless direction already, as > I feared it would. > > Nobody is going to configure bridges, classification, tc, and all of > this other crap just for a simple virtualized guest networking device. > > It's a confined and well defined case that doesn't need any of that. > You've got to be fucking kidding me if you think I'm going to go > through the bridging code and all of that layering instead of my > hash demux on transmit which is 4 or 5 lines of C code at best. > > Such a suggestion is beyond stupid. >
Ok, calm down - will you please? If you are soliciting for opinions, then you should be expecting all sorts of answers, otherwise why bother posting. If you think you are misunderstood just clarify. Otherwise you are being totaly unreasonable. > Maybe for the control node switch, yes, but not for the guest network > devices. And that is precisely what i was talking about - and i am sure thats how the discussion with Patrick was. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
