On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 11:47:55PM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote:
> Thomas Bogendoerfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> [...]
> > +static inline void init_rx_bufs(struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> > +   struct i596_private *lp = netdev_priv(dev);
> > +   struct i596_dma *dma = lp->dma;
> > +   int i;
> > +   struct i596_rfd *rfd;
> > +   struct i596_rbd *rbd;
> > +
> > +   /* First build the Receive Buffer Descriptor List */
> > +
> > +   for (i = 0, rbd = dma->rbds; i < rx_ring_size; i++, rbd++) {
> > +           dma_addr_t dma_addr;
> > +           struct sk_buff *skb = dev_alloc_skb(PKT_BUF_SZ + 4);
> > +
> > +           if (skb == NULL)
> > +                   panic(KERN_ERR "%s: alloc_skb() failed", __FILE__);
> 
> The driver could use netdev_alloc_skb.

what's the advantage ?

> init_rx_bufs() should handle failure more gracefully and return a proper
> status code.

of course.

> 
> [...]
> > +static int init_i596_mem(struct net_device *dev)
> > +{
> [...]
> > +   if (request_irq(dev->irq, &i596_interrupt, 0, "i82596", dev)) {
> > +           printk(KERN_ERR "%s: IRQ %d not free\n", dev->name, dev->irq);
> > +           goto failed_free_irq;
> > +   }
> [...]
> > +failed_free_irq:
> > +   free_irq(dev->irq, dev);
> 
> Oops.

thanks, will fix.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to