On Wed, 11 Sep 2024 07:28:36 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> 
wrote:
> As gcc luckily noted:
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 03:33:20PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > @@ -1617,23 +1617,24 @@ static void detach_buf_packed(struct 
> > vring_virtqueue *vq,
> >     }
> >
> >     if (vq->indirect) {
> > +           struct vring_desc_extra *extra;
> >             u32 len;
> >
> >             /* Free the indirect table, if any, now that it's unmapped. */
> > -           desc = state->indir_desc;
> > -           if (!desc)
>
> desc is no longer initialized here


Will fix.


>
> > +           extra = state->indir;
> > +           if (!extra)
> >                     return;
> >
> >             if (vring_need_unmap_buffer(vq)) {
> >                     len = vq->packed.desc_extra[id].len;
> >                     for (i = 0; i < len / sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc);
> >                                     i++)
> > -                           vring_unmap_desc_packed(vq, &desc[i]);
> > +                           vring_unmap_extra_packed(vq, &extra[i]);
> >             }
> >             kfree(desc);
>
>
> but freed here
>
> > -           state->indir_desc = NULL;
> > +           state->indir = NULL;
> >     } else if (ctx) {
> > -           *ctx = state->indir_desc;
> > +           *ctx = state->indir;
> >     }
> >  }
>
>
> It seems unlikely this was always 0 on all paths with even
> a small amount of stress, so now I question how this was tested.
> Besides, do not ignore compiler warnings, and do not tweak code
> to just make compiler shut up - they are your friend.

I agree.

Normally I do this by make W=12, but we have too many message,
so I missed this.

        make W=12 drivers/net/virtio_net.o drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.o

If not W=12, then I did not get any warning message.
How do you get the message quickly?

Thanks.

>
> >
> > --
> > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
>

Reply via email to