On Thu, 1 Aug 2024 08:30:44 -0400, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 08:27:39PM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> > Don't break the resize action if the vq coalescing feature
> > named VIRTIO_NET_F_VQ_NOTF_COAL is not negotiated.
> > 
> > Fixes: f61fe5f081cf ("virtio-net: fix the vq coalescing setting for vq 
> > resize")
> > Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hen...@linux.alibaba.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanz...@linux.alibaba.com>
> > Acked-by: Eugenio Pé rez <epere...@redhat.com>
> > Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > v2->v3:
> >   - Break out the feature check and the fix into separate patches.
> > 
> > v1->v2:
> >   - Rephrase the subject.
> >   - Put the feature check inside the virtnet_send_{r,t}x_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd().
> > 
> >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index b1176be8fcfd..2b566d893ea3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -3749,7 +3749,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_ringparam(struct net_device 
> > *dev,
> >                     err = virtnet_send_tx_ctrl_coal_vq_cmd(vi, i,
> >                                                            
> > vi->intr_coal_tx.max_usecs,
> >                                                            
> > vi->intr_coal_tx.max_packets);
> > -                   if (err)
> > +                   if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
> >                             return err;
> >             }
> >  
> > @@ -3764,7 +3764,7 @@ static int virtnet_set_ringparam(struct net_device 
> > *dev,
> >                                                            
> > vi->intr_coal_rx.max_usecs,
> >                                                            
> > vi->intr_coal_rx.max_packets);
> >                     mutex_unlock(&vi->rq[i].dim_lock);
> > -                   if (err)
> > +                   if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
> >                             return err;
> 
> 
> This needs a comment.
> 

Since both the patch and the comment are small, I will send out the next version
soon and hope to get the understanding of the netdev maintainers.

Thanks.

> 
> >             }
> >     }
> > -- 
> > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
> 

Reply via email to