On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:11:55 +0800, Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 4:17 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanz...@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >
> > The virtio-net big mode did not enable premapped mode,
> > so we did not need to check the unmap. And the subsequent
> > commit will remove the failover code for failing enable
> > premapped for merge and small mode. So we need to remove
> > the checking do_dma code in the big mode path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanz...@linux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index c22d1118a133..16d84c95779c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -820,7 +820,7 @@ static void virtnet_rq_unmap_free_buf(struct virtqueue
> > *vq, void *buf)
> >
> > rq = &vi->rq[i];
> >
> > - if (rq->do_dma)
> > + if (!vi->big_packets || vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
>
> This seems to be equivalent to
>
> if (!vi->big_packets)
If VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF and guest_gso are coexisting,
big_packets and mergeable_rx_bufs are all true.
!vi->big_packets only means the small.
Did I miss something?
Thanks.
>
>
> > virtnet_rq_unmap(rq, buf, 0);
> >
> > virtnet_rq_free_buf(vi, rq, buf);
> > @@ -2128,7 +2128,7 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq,
> > int budget,
> > }
> > } else {
> > while (packets < budget &&
> > - (buf = virtnet_rq_get_buf(rq, &len, NULL)) != NULL) {
> > + (buf = virtqueue_get_buf(rq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> > receive_buf(vi, rq, buf, len, NULL, xdp_xmit,
> > &stats);
> > packets++;
> > }
>
> Other part looks good.
>
> Thanks
>
> > --
> > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
> >
>
