Hi all, Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks -- Gustavo On 3/5/21 03:22, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple > warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of > letting the code fall through to the next case. > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo...@kernel.org> > --- > net/netrom/nr_route.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/net/netrom/nr_route.c b/net/netrom/nr_route.c > index 78da5eab252a..de9821b6a62a 100644 > --- a/net/netrom/nr_route.c > +++ b/net/netrom/nr_route.c > @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, > const char *mnemonic, > fallthrough; > case 2: > re_sort_routes(nr_node, 0, 1); > + break; > case 1: > break; > } > @@ -359,6 +360,7 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, > ax25_address *neighbour, struct n > fallthrough; > case 1: > nr_node->routes[1] = nr_node->routes[2]; > + break; > case 2: > break; > } > @@ -482,6 +484,7 @@ static int nr_dec_obs(void) > fallthrough; > case 1: > s->routes[1] = s->routes[2]; > + break; > case 2: > break; > } > @@ -529,6 +532,7 @@ void nr_rt_device_down(struct net_device *dev) > fallthrough; > case 1: > t->routes[1] = > t->routes[2]; > + break; > case 2: > break; > } >
