Hi all, Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
Thanks -- Gustavo On 3/5/21 03:25, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning > by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall > through to the next case. > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo...@kernel.org> > --- > net/tipc/link.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/net/tipc/link.c b/net/tipc/link.c > index 115109259430..bcc426e16725 100644 > --- a/net/tipc/link.c > +++ b/net/tipc/link.c > @@ -649,6 +649,7 @@ int tipc_link_fsm_evt(struct tipc_link *l, int evt) > break; > case LINK_FAILOVER_BEGIN_EVT: > l->state = LINK_FAILINGOVER; > + break; > case LINK_FAILURE_EVT: > case LINK_RESET_EVT: > case LINK_ESTABLISH_EVT: >
