Le Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:14:52AM -0700, Cong Wang a écrit : > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 4:17 PM Du Cheng <duche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c > > index 8287894541e3..abd6b176383c 100644 > > --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c > > +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c > > @@ -901,6 +901,10 @@ static int parse_taprio_schedule(struct taprio_sched > > *q, struct nlattr **tb, > > > > list_for_each_entry(entry, &new->entries, list) > > cycle = ktime_add_ns(cycle, entry->interval); > > + > > + if (!cycle) > > + return -EINVAL; > > Just a nit: please add an extack to explain why we return EINVAL here. > > Thanks.
Hi Cong, Thanks! I added extack and submitted v4. Please help me review. Regards, Du Cheng
