From: Geliang Tang <geliangt...@gmail.com>

Some of the sequence numbers are printed as the negative ones in the debug
log:

[   46.250932] MPTCP: DSS
[   46.250940] MPTCP: data_fin=0 dsn64=0 use_map=0 ack64=1 use_ack=1
[   46.250948] MPTCP: data_ack=2344892449471675613
[   46.251012] MPTCP: msk=000000006e157e3f status=10
[   46.251023] MPTCP: msk=000000006e157e3f snd_data_fin_enable=0 pending=0 
snd_nxt=2344892449471700189 write_seq=2344892449471700189
[   46.251343] MPTCP: msk=00000000ec44a129 ssk=00000000f7abd481 sending dfrag 
at seq=-1658937016627538668 len=100 already sent=0
[   46.251360] MPTCP: data_seq=16787807057082012948 subflow_seq=1 data_len=100 
dsn64=1

This patch used the format specifier %u instead of %d for the unsigned int
values to fix it.

Fixes: d9ca1de8c0cd ("mptcp: move page frag allocation in mptcp_sendmsg()")
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.bae...@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangt...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martin...@linux.intel.com>
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 073e20078ed0..9d0b9f76ab3c 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -1294,7 +1294,7 @@ static int mptcp_sendmsg_frag(struct sock *sk, struct 
sock *ssk,
        int avail_size;
        size_t ret = 0;
 
-       pr_debug("msk=%p ssk=%p sending dfrag at seq=%lld len=%d already 
sent=%d",
+       pr_debug("msk=%p ssk=%p sending dfrag at seq=%llu len=%u already 
sent=%u",
                 msk, ssk, dfrag->data_seq, dfrag->data_len, info->sent);
 
        /* compute send limit */
@@ -1712,7 +1712,7 @@ static int mptcp_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr 
*msg, size_t len)
                        if (!msk->first_pending)
                                WRITE_ONCE(msk->first_pending, dfrag);
                }
-               pr_debug("msk=%p dfrag at seq=%lld len=%d sent=%d new=%d", msk,
+               pr_debug("msk=%p dfrag at seq=%llu len=%u sent=%u new=%d", msk,
                         dfrag->data_seq, dfrag->data_len, dfrag->already_sent,
                         !dfrag_collapsed);
 
-- 
2.31.1

Reply via email to