On 10/04/2021 20:17, Cong Wang wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <cong.w...@bytedance.com>
> 
> syzbot is able to setup kTLS on an SMC socket, which coincidentally
> uses sk_user_data too, later, kTLS treats it as psock so triggers a
> refcnt warning. The cause is that smc_setsockopt() simply calls
> TCP setsockopt(). I do not think it makes sense to setup kTLS on
> top of SMC, so we can just disallow this.
> 
> Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+b54a1ce86ba4a623b...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastab...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Karsten Graul <kgr...@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.w...@bytedance.com>
> ---
>  net/smc/af_smc.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> index 47340b3b514f..0d4d6d28f20c 100644
> --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
> +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
> @@ -2162,6 +2162,9 @@ static int smc_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int 
> level, int optname,
>       struct smc_sock *smc;
>       int val, rc;
>  
> +     if (optname == TCP_ULP)
> +             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
>       smc = smc_sk(sk);
>  
>       /* generic setsockopts reaching us here always apply to the
> @@ -2186,7 +2189,6 @@ static int smc_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int 
> level, int optname,
>       if (rc || smc->use_fallback)
>               goto out;
>       switch (optname) {
> -     case TCP_ULP:

Should'nt it return -EOPNOTSUPP in that case, too?

>       case TCP_FASTOPEN:
>       case TCP_FASTOPEN_CONNECT:
>       case TCP_FASTOPEN_KEY:
> 

-- 
Karsten

(I'm a dude)

Reply via email to