On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 13:19:52 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 10:16:13AM +0300, Claudiu Manoil wrote: > > Even if the current mapping is correct for the 1 CPU and 2 CPU cases > > (currently enetc is included in SoCs with up to 2 CPUs only), better > > use a generic rule for the mapping to cover all possible cases. > > The number of CPUs is the same as the number of interrupt vectors: > > > > Per device Tx rings - > > device_tx_ring[idx], where idx = 0..n_rings_total-1 > > > > Per interrupt vector Tx rings - > > int_vector[i].ring[j], where i = 0..n_int_vects-1 > > j = 0..n_rings_per_v-1 > > > > Mapping rule - > > n_rings_per_v = n_rings_total / n_int_vects > > for i = 0..n_int_vects - 1: > > for j = 0..n_rings_per_v - 1: > > idx = n_int_vects * j + i > > int_vector[i].ring[j] <- device_tx_ring[idx] > > > > Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.man...@nxp.com> > > Tested-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.olt...@nxp.com>
Applied, thanks!
