On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 20:01:14 +0300 Vadym Kochan wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 09:51:13AM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote: > > On 4/9/2021 9:22 AM, Oleksandr Mazur wrote: > > > I'd like to discuss a possibility of handling devlink port parameters > > > with devlink port pointer supplied. > > > > > > Current design makes it impossible to distinguish which port's parameter > > > should get altered (set) or retrieved (get) whenever there's a single > > > parameter registered within a few ports. > > > > I also noticed this issue recently when trying to add port parameters and > > I have a patch that handles this in a different way. The ops in > > devlink_param > > struct can be updated to include port_index as an argument > > We were thinking on this direction but rather decided to have more strict > cb signature which reflects that we are working with devlink_port only.
+1 for passing the actual pointer
