> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
> Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 8:41 PM
> To: Dexuan Cui <de...@microsoft.com>
> Cc: k...@kernel.org; KY Srinivasan <k...@microsoft.com>; Haiyang Zhang
> <haiya...@microsoft.com>; Stephen Hemminger
> <sthem...@microsoft.com>; wei....@kernel.org; Wei Liu
> <li...@microsoft.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; l...@kernel.org;
> and...@lunn.ch; be...@petrovitsch.priv.at; rdun...@infradead.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-hyp...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] net: mana: Add a driver for Microsoft Azure
> Network Adapter (MANA)
>
> From: Dexuan Cui <de...@microsoft.com>
> Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 00:24:51 +0000
>
> >> From: David Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
> >> Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 4:46 PM
> >> ...
> >> > +struct gdma_msg_hdr {
> >> > + u32 hdr_type;
> >> > + u32 msg_type;
> >> > + u16 msg_version;
> >> > + u16 hwc_msg_id;
> >> > + u32 msg_size;
> >> > +} __packed;
> >> > +
> >> > +struct gdma_dev_id {
> >> > + union {
> >> > + struct {
> >> > + u16 type;
> >> > + u16 instance;
> >> > + };
> >> > +
> >> > + u32 as_uint32;
> >> > + };
> >> > +} __packed;
> >>
> >> Please don't use __packed unless absolutely necessary. It generates
> >> suboptimal code (byte at a time
> >> accesses etc.) and for many of these you don't even need it.
> >
> > In the driver code, all the structs/unions marked by __packed are used to
> > talk with the hardware, so I think __packed is necessary here?
>
> It actually isan't in many cases, check with and without the __packed
> directive
> and see if anything chasnges.
>
> > Do you think if it's better if we remove all the __packed, and add
> > static_assert(sizeof(struct XXX) == YYY) instead? e.g.
> >
> > @@ -105,7 +105,8 @@ struct gdma_msg_hdr {
> > u16 msg_version;
> > u16 hwc_msg_id;
> > u32 msg_size;
> > -} __packed;
> > +};
> > +static_assert(sizeof(struct gdma_msg_hdr) == 16);
>
> This won't make sure the structure member offsets are what you expect.
>
> I think you'll have to go through the structures one-by-one by hand to
> figure out which ones really require the __packed attribute and which do not.
For the structs containing variables with the same sizes, or already size
aligned
variables, we knew the __packed has no effect. And for these structs, it
doesn't
cause performance impact either, correct?
But in the future, if different sized variables are added, the __packed may
become necessary again. To prevent anyone accidently forget to add __packed
when adding new variables to these structs, can we keep the __packed for all
messages going through the "wire"?
Thanks,
- Haiyang
