Hello Dan,
Thanks for your report!
在 2021/3/24 15:01, Dan Carpenter 写道:
Hello Jian Shen,
The patch 5f2b1238b33c: "net: hns3: refactor out
hclge_add_fd_entry()" from Mar 22, 2021, leads to the following
static checker warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c:6512
hclge_fd_parse_ring_cookie()
warn: array off by one? 'hdev->vport[vf]'
drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_main.c
6493 static int hclge_fd_parse_ring_cookie(struct hclge_dev *hdev, u64
ring_cookie,
6494 u16 *vport_id, u8 *action, u16
*queue_id)
6495 {
6496 struct hclge_vport *vport = hdev->vport;
6497
6498 if (ring_cookie == RX_CLS_FLOW_DISC) {
6499 *action = HCLGE_FD_ACTION_DROP_PACKET;
6500 } else {
6501 u32 ring = ethtool_get_flow_spec_ring(ring_cookie);
6502 u8 vf = ethtool_get_flow_spec_ring_vf(ring_cookie);
6503 u16 tqps;
6504
6505 if (vf > hdev->num_req_vfs) {
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The is off by one but checking hdev->num_req_vfs in this context doesn't
make sense. Should it instead be check hdev->num_alloc_vport? Also
should we add HCLGE_VF_VPORT_START_NUM?
vf = ethtool_get_flow_spec_ring_vf(ring_cookie);
vf += HCLGE_VF_VPORT_START_NUM;
if (vf >= hdev->num_alloc_vport)
return -EINVAL;
6506 dev_err(&hdev->pdev->dev,
6507 "Error: vf id (%u) > max vf num
(%u)\n",
^^
Use >=
6508 vf, hdev->num_req_vfs);
6509 return -EINVAL;
6510 }
6511
6512 *vport_id = vf ? hdev->vport[vf].vport_id :
vport->vport_id;
^^^^^^^^^
6513 tqps = hdev->vport[vf].nic.kinfo.num_tqps;
^^^
The vport array has hdev->num_vmdq_vport + hdev->num_req_vfs + 1;
elements. ->vport[0] is tqp_main_vport. The next elements are
hdev->num_vmdq_vport and the last part of the array is hdev->num_req_vfs.
Another possibility is that perhaps this is what was intended?
idx = vf + 1 + hdev->num_vmdq_vport;
*vport_id = vf ? vport[idx].vport_id :
vport[0].vport_id;
tqps = vport[idx].nic.kinfo.num_tqps;
There is related code that offers clues but I'm not sure what to do.
6514
6515 if (ring >= tqps) {
6516 dev_err(&hdev->pdev->dev,
6517 "Error: queue id (%u) > max tqp num
(%u)\n",
6518 ring, tqps - 1);
6519 return -EINVAL;
6520 }
6521
6522 *action = HCLGE_FD_ACTION_SELECT_QUEUE;
6523 *queue_id = ring;
6524 }
6525
6526 return 0;
6527 }
[ snip ]
9111 static bool hclge_check_vf_mac_exist(struct hclge_vport *vport, int
vf_idx,
9112 u8 *mac_addr)
9113 {
9114 struct hclge_mac_vlan_tbl_entry_cmd req;
9115 struct hclge_dev *hdev = vport->back;
9116 struct hclge_desc desc;
9117 u16 egress_port = 0;
9118 int i;
9119
9120 if (is_zero_ether_addr(mac_addr))
9121 return false;
9122
9123 memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req));
9124 hnae3_set_field(egress_port, HCLGE_MAC_EPORT_VFID_M,
9125 HCLGE_MAC_EPORT_VFID_S, vport->vport_id);
9126 req.egress_port = cpu_to_le16(egress_port);
9127 hclge_prepare_mac_addr(&req, mac_addr, false);
9128
9129 if (hclge_lookup_mac_vlan_tbl(vport, &req, &desc, false) !=
-ENOENT)
9130 return true;
9131
9132 vf_idx += HCLGE_VF_VPORT_START_NUM;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
We're are skipping the first element. Should it instead be?:
vf_idx += hdev->num_vmdq_vport + 1;
9133 for (i = hdev->num_vmdq_vport + 1; i < hdev->num_alloc_vport;
i++)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
We're only checking the last part of the array.
9134 if (i != vf_idx &&
9135 ether_addr_equal(mac_addr,
hdev->vport[i].vf_info.mac))
9136 return true;
9137
9138 return false;
9139 }
Another thing that's not clear to me is how pci_num_vf() relates to
this. I suspect that it is the same as hdev->num_vmdq_vport, but I
can't be sure.
regards,
dan carpenter
.
The use for num_vmdq_vport is confusing. At the beginning, the HNS3
driver is planed to support
VMDQ . Whereafter the hardware supports SR-IOV with better performance.
So VMDQ feature is
discarded, but the codes of vmdq is remained. For the value of
num_vmdq_vport is always 0, so the
vport id of VF is actually start from 1. That's why the driver still work.
As the num_vmdq_vport is actually useless and confusing, I will send a
patch to remove it soon.
regards,
Jian Shen
