Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It appears to be something in the latest dump from davem to Linus, but I > haven't yet had time to identify what.
You want this patch which should hit the tree soon. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- [IPV4]: Do not remove idev when addresses are cleared Now that we create idev before addresses are added, it no longer makes sense to remove them when addresses are all deleted. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/net/ipv4/devinet.c b/net/ipv4/devinet.c index 354e800..0cf813f 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/devinet.c +++ b/net/ipv4/devinet.c @@ -327,12 +327,8 @@ static void __inet_del_ifa(struct in_device *in_dev, struct in_ifaddr **ifap, } } - if (destroy) { + if (destroy) inet_free_ifa(ifa1); - - if (!in_dev->ifa_list) - inetdev_destroy(in_dev); - } } static void inet_del_ifa(struct in_device *in_dev, struct in_ifaddr **ifap, - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
