Hello, On Mon, 2021-03-22 at 09:44 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgro_fwd.sh > > b/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgro_fwd.sh > > new file mode 100755 > > index 0000000000000..ac7ac56a27524 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgro_fwd.sh > > @@ -0,0 +1,251 @@ > > +#!/bin/sh > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > + > > +readonly BASE="ns-$(mktemp -u XXXXXX)" > > +readonly SRC=2 > > +readonly DST=1 > > +readonly DST_NAT=100 > > +readonly NS_SRC=$BASE$SRC > > +readonly NS_DST=$BASE$DST > > + > > +# "baremetal" network used for raw UDP traffic > > +readonly BM_NET_V4=192.168.1. > > +readonly BM_NET_V6=2001:db8:: > > + > > +# "overlay" network used for UDP over UDP tunnel traffic > > +readonly OL_NET_V4=172.16.1. > > +readonly OL_NET_V6=2002:db8:: > > is it okay to use a prod64 prefix for this? should this be another > subnet of 2001:db8:: instead? of fd..
It looks like this comment slipped out of my sight... yep, I'll use 2001:db8:1:: for the overlay network in the next iteration. Thanks! Paolo
