On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 05:04:47PM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:47:46 +0200 > Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodi...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 03:41:23PM +0000, Alexander Lobakin wrote: > > > From: Matteo Croce <mcr...@linux.microsoft.com> > > > Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:02:55 +0100 > > > > > > > From: Matteo Croce <mcr...@microsoft.com> > > > > > > > > This series enables recycling of the buffers allocated with the > > > > page_pool API. > > > > The first two patches are just prerequisite to save space in a struct > > > > and > > > > avoid recycling pages allocated with other API. > > > > Patch 2 was based on a previous idea from Jonathan Lemon. > > > > > > > > The third one is the real recycling, 4 fixes the compilation of > > > > __skb_frag_unref > > > > users, and 5,6 enable the recycling on two drivers. > > > > > > > > In the last two patches I reported the improvement I have with the > > > > series. > > > > > > > > The recycling as is can't be used with drivers like mlx5 which do page > > > > split, > > > > but this is documented in a comment. > > > > In the future, a refcount can be used so to support mlx5 with no > > > > changes. > > > > > > > > Ilias Apalodimas (2): > > > > page_pool: DMA handling and allow to recycles frames via SKB > > > > net: change users of __skb_frag_unref() and add an extra argument > > > > > > > > Jesper Dangaard Brouer (1): > > > > xdp: reduce size of struct xdp_mem_info > > > > > > > > Matteo Croce (3): > > > > mm: add a signature in struct page > > > > mvpp2: recycle buffers > > > > mvneta: recycle buffers > > > > > > > > .../chelsio/inline_crypto/ch_ktls/chcr_ktls.c | 2 +- > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 4 +- > > > > .../net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c | 17 +++---- > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/sky2.c | 2 +- > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c | 2 +- > > > > include/linux/mm_types.h | 1 + > > > > include/linux/skbuff.h | 33 +++++++++++-- > > > > include/net/page_pool.h | 15 ++++++ > > > > include/net/xdp.h | 5 +- > > > > net/core/page_pool.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > > net/core/skbuff.c | 20 +++++++- > > > > net/core/xdp.c | 14 ++++-- > > > > net/tls/tls_device.c | 2 +- > > > > 13 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > > > > > Just for the reference, I've performed some tests on 1G SoC NIC with > > > this patchset on, here's direct link: [0] > > > > > > > Thanks for the testing! > > Any chance you can get a perf measurement on this? > > I guess you mean perf-report (--stdio) output, right? >
Yea, As hinted below, I am just trying to figure out if on Alexander's platform the cost of syncing, is bigger that free-allocate. I remember one armv7 were that was the case. > > Is DMA syncing taking a substantial amount of your cpu usage? > > (+1 this is an important question) > > > > > > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210323153550.130385-1-aloba...@pm.me > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Jesper Dangaard Brouer > MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer >
